Chapter 2
detailed summary tables of results

 2.1 List of integrals sorted by grade for each CAS
  2.1.1 Rubi
  2.1.2 Mathematica
  2.1.3 Maple
  2.1.4 Maxima
  2.1.5 FriCAS
  2.1.6 Sympy
  2.1.7 Giac
 2.2 Detailed conclusion table per each integral for all CAS systems
 2.3 Detailed conclusion table specific for Rubi results

2.1 List of integrals sorted by grade for each CAS

2.1.1 Rubi

A grade: { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 }

B grade: { }

C grade: { }

F grade: { }

2.1.2 Mathematica

A grade: { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 }

B grade: { 6, 8 }

C grade: { }

F grade: { }

2.1.3 Maple

A grade: { 2, 4, 5, 7, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15 }

B grade: { 1, 3, 6, 8, 9, 11, 16 }

C grade: { }

F grade: { }

2.1.4 Maxima

A grade: { 2, 4, 5, 7, 10, 12, 13, 15

B grade: { 1, 3, 6, 8 }

C grade: { }

F grade: { 9, 11, 14, 16 }

2.1.5 FriCAS

A grade: { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 }

B grade: { }

C grade: { }

F grade: { }

2.1.6 Sympy

A grade: { }

B grade: { }

C grade: { }

F grade: { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 }

2.1.7 Giac

A grade: { 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 }

B grade: { 1, 8, 9 }

C grade: { }

F grade: { }

2.2 Detailed conclusion table per each integral for all CAS systems

Detailed conclusion table per each integral is given by table below. The elapsed time is in seconds. For failed result it is given as F(-1) if the failure was due to timeout. It is given as F(-2) if the failure was due to an exception being raised, which could indicate a bug in the system. If the failure was due to integral not being evaluated within the time limit, then it is given just an F.

In this table,the column normalized size is defined as \(\frac{\text{antiderivative leaf size}}{\text{optimal antiderivative leaf size}}\)










Problem 1 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A B B A F B
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 44 44 40 172 212 82 0 105
normalized size 1 1. 0.91 3.91 4.82 1.86 0. 2.39
time (sec) N/A 0.122 0.042 0.057 1.444 0.476 0. 1.295


















Problem 2 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A A A A F A
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 23 23 17 18 24 63 0 24
normalized size 1 1. 0.74 0.78 1.04 2.74 0. 1.04
time (sec) N/A 0.101 0.017 0.042 0.96 0.466 0. 1.331


















Problem 3 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A B B A F A
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 27 27 27 87 109 51 0 59
normalized size 1 1. 1. 3.22 4.04 1.89 0. 2.19
time (sec) N/A 0.091 0.034 0.058 1.598 0.466 0. 1.346


















Problem 4 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A A A A F A
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 17 17 17 27 23 42 0 23
normalized size 1 1. 1. 1.59 1.35 2.47 0. 1.35
time (sec) N/A 0.06 0.014 0.039 1.05 0.48 0. 1.137


















Problem 5 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A A A A F A
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 33 33 17 33 42 117 0 46
normalized size 1 1. 0.52 1. 1.27 3.55 0. 1.39
time (sec) N/A 0.073 0.025 0.044 1.05 0.483 0. 1.324


















Problem 6 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A B B B A F A
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 23 23 56 47 90 80 0 50
normalized size 1 1. 2.43 2.04 3.91 3.48 0. 2.17
time (sec) N/A 0.107 0.077 0.047 0.973 0.454 0. 1.389


















Problem 7 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A A A A F A
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 46 46 25 44 73 220 0 65
normalized size 1 1. 0.54 0.96 1.59 4.78 0. 1.41
time (sec) N/A 0.127 0.05 0.048 0.952 0.495 0. 1.388


















Problem 8 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A B B B A F B
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 34 34 85 87 225 127 0 101
normalized size 1 1. 2.5 2.56 6.62 3.74 0. 2.97
time (sec) N/A 0.121 0.143 0.053 0.983 0.461 0. 1.44


















Problem 9 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A B F(-2) A F B
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 130 130 127 514 0 791 0 375
normalized size 1 1. 0.98 3.95 0. 6.08 0. 2.88
time (sec) N/A 0.325 0.749 0.065 0. 0.563 0. 1.249


















Problem 10 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A A A A F(-1) A
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 61 61 60 64 81 147 0 84
normalized size 1 1. 0.98 1.05 1.33 2.41 0. 1.38
time (sec) N/A 0.131 0.118 0.036 0.964 0.511 0. 1.218


















Problem 11 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A B F(-2) A F A
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 80 80 75 184 0 514 0 163
normalized size 1 1. 0.94 2.3 0. 6.42 0. 2.04
time (sec) N/A 0.19 0.134 0.053 0. 0.536 0. 1.455


















Problem 12 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A A A A F A
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 20 20 19 31 27 53 0 28
normalized size 1 1. 0.95 1.55 1.35 2.65 0. 1.4
time (sec) N/A 0.063 0.012 0.039 0.956 0.49 0. 1.349


















Problem 13 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A A A A F A
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 54 54 64 55 65 128 0 72
normalized size 1 1. 1.19 1.02 1.2 2.37 0. 1.33
time (sec) N/A 0.084 0.071 0.041 0.974 0.52 0. 1.429


















Problem 14 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A A F(-2) A F A
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 65 65 97 92 0 576 0 128
normalized size 1 1. 1.49 1.42 0. 8.86 0. 1.97
time (sec) N/A 0.135 0.306 0.056 0. 0.517 0. 1.416


















Problem 15 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A A A A F A
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 85 85 139 89 146 302 0 174
normalized size 1 1. 1.64 1.05 1.72 3.55 0. 2.05
time (sec) N/A 0.187 0.399 0.055 0.971 0.593 0. 1.331


















Problem 16 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A B F(-2) A F A
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 109 109 121 200 0 882 0 252
normalized size 1 1. 1.11 1.83 0. 8.09 0. 2.31
time (sec) N/A 0.239 0.758 0.061 0. 0.563 0. 1.399









2.3 Detailed conclusion table specific for Rubi results

The following table is specific to Rubi. It gives additional statistics for each integral. the column steps is the number of steps used by Rubi to obtain the antiderivative. The rules column is the number of unique rules used. The integrand size column is the leaf size of the integrand. Finally the ratio \(\frac{\text{number of rules}}{\text{integrand size}}\) is given. The larger this ratio is, the harder the integral was to solve. In this test, problem number [5] had the largest ratio of [ 0.5455 ]

Table 2.1Rubi specific breakdown of results for each integral














# grade
number of
steps
used
number of
unique
rules
normalized
antiderivative
leaf size
integrand
leaf size
\(\frac{\text{number of rules}}{\text{integrand leaf size}}\)







1 A 7 7 1. 13 0.538







2 A 6 4 1. 13 0.308







3 A 5 5 1. 13 0.385







4 A 5 4 1. 11 0.364







5 A 6 6 1. 11 0.546







6 A 6 5 1. 13 0.385







7 A 7 7 1. 13 0.538







8 A 7 6 1. 13 0.462







9 A 7 6 1. 13 0.462







10 A 5 4 1. 13 0.308







11 A 6 6 1. 13 0.462







12 A 5 4 1. 11 0.364







13 A 4 3 1. 11 0.273







14 A 6 6 1. 13 0.462







15 A 6 5 1. 13 0.385







16 A 7 6 1. 13 0.462